Events

2019 Regional Meetings

Open Calls for Papers:

Eastern International Region
(
CFP Deadline: Feb. 1, 2019)

New England & Canadian Maritimes Joint Region
(CFP Deadline: Jan. 18, 2019)

Mid-Atlantic Region
(CFP Deadline: Dec. 22, 2018)

Midwestern Region
(CFP Deadline: Nov. 3rd, 2018)

Pacific Northwest
(CFP Deadline: Jan. 30th, 2019)

Rocky Mountain-Great Plains Region
(CFP Deadline: Nov. 9, 2018)

Open Registration:

Registration closed.

Advertisement

2018 Program Committee Proceedings

American Academy of Religion Program Committee Meeting
Atlanta, Georgia • January 12-14, 2018

Program Committee Roster
2017 Annual Meeting Report
2018 Annual Meeting Program and Reviews
Other Business
Committee Deliberation of Program Unit Reviews
Proposals for New Program Units
Tools Used in the Program Committee's Evaluation Processes


Program Committee Roster

Kathryn McClymond

Kathryn McClymond
Georgia State University

Program Committee Chair
2017–2019

Tao Jiang

Tao Jiang

Rutgers University

2016–2020

Julie Byrne Julie Byrne
Hofstra University

2016–2020

Grace Ji-Sun Kim Grace Ji-Sun Kim
Earlham College

2016–2018

Amy DeRogatis

Amy DeRogatis

Michigan State University

2018–2022

Santiago Slabosky

Santiago Slabodsky

Hofstra University

2018–2022

Martha Finch

Martha Finch
Missouri State University

2015–2019

Najeeba Syeed-Miller

Najeeba Syeed-Miller
Claremont School of Theology

2016–2020

Shreena Gandhi

Shreena Gandhi
Michigan State University

2014–2018

Linda Thomas

Linda Thomas
Lutheran School of Theology, Chicago

2014–2018

 

Michelle Gonzalez Maldonado

Michelle Gonzalez Maldonado
University of Miami

2015–2019

Deborah Whitehead

Deborah Whitehead
University of Colorado

2017–2021

Juliane Hammer

Juliane Hammer
University of North Carolina

2017–2021

Jack Fitzmier Jack Fitzmier
AAR Executive Director
Tracey Hucks

Tracey Hucks
Colgate University

2017–2021

Robert Puckett Robert Puckett
AAR Director of Meetings

 2017 Annual Meeting Report

2017 Post-Annual Meeting Survey Narrative

2017 Post-Annual Meeting Survey Results


2018 Annual Meeting Program and Reviews

Program Unit Chair Changes

Approving 2018 Call for Proposals

Brainstorming 2018 Reviewers and Assigning Lead Readers


Other Business

Related Scholarly Organizations (RSOs) renewal applications and review procedures


Committee Deliberation of Program Unit Reviews

 

Program Unit

Decision

Arts, Literature, and Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 5

Body and Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Buddhism in the West

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Chinese Religions

5-year renewal; Tier 3

Comparative Approaches to Religion and Violence

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Contemporary Pagan Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Cultural History of the Study of Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Daoist Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Ecclesial Practices

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Hinduism

5-year renewal; Tier 4

Interreligious and Interfaith Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Japanese Religions

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Kierkegaard, Religion, and Culture

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Pentecostal-Charismatic Movements

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Philosophy of Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 5

Psychology, Culture, and Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 3

Quaker Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Religion and Disability Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Religion and Food

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Religion, Affect, and Emotion

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Ritual Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 2

Sacred Texts and Ethics

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Schleiermacher

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Science, Technology, and Religion

5-year renewal; Tier 3

Scriptural Reasoning

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Secularism and Secularity

5-year renewal; Tier 1

Study of Judaism

5-year renewal; Tier 4

Vatican II Studies

5-year renewal; Tier 1


Proposals for New Program Units

 

Units

Decision

Monsters, Monster Theory, and Religion

Declined

Religion and War

Declined

Spiritual But Not Religious

Declined


Tools Used in the Program Committee's Evaluation Processes

Tools Used in the Program Committee's Evaluation Processes

A. Program Unit’s Annual Reports

B. Program Unit’s Five-year Self Review

This document states the aims of the unit, its procedures, its programming accomplishments, and a rationale for the unit’s continued existence. Among the criteria deemed relevant to the self-review include:

  1. The extent to which the field of interest represented by the unit continues to reflect a major area of interest and work for a significant portion of the Academy's membership; one possible metric by which this may be measured is the number and quality of proposals the unit receives.

  2. The intellectual rigor, imagination, conceptual richness, and distinction of the work carried on by the unit, whether through the presentation of papers, the sponsorship of discussions, or the publication of proceedings.

  3. The degree of commitment that the unit's constituency exhibits to the ongoing life of the unit; one possible metric by which this may be measured is the attendance at the unit’s Annual Meeting sessions.

  4. The procedural health of the unit, including leadership practices, such as mechanisms for selecting new chairs and steering committee members; communication within the unit, between units, and with the AAR; and the unit’s proposal review process and other decision making practices.

  5. The extent to which the unit's constituency has been afforded an opportunity to participate in the sessions (with attention to diversity of seniority, race, ethnicity, nationality, and gender among participants).

  6. The unit's range of appeal to those members of the Academy whose own fields of specialization do not typically fall within the field of interest represented by the unit and the unit's ability to involve such people periodically in its programs; one possible metric by which this may be measured is the number of sessions which the unit cosponsors with other Program Units.

  7. Over the course of the next five years, the promise the unit offers for advancing the academic study of religion, or the relation of that study to other disciplines.

C. External Reviewer Reports (if applicable)

If a Unit requests a change of status, additional sessions, requests an external review, or if the Program Committee, after its examination of the Program Unit’s metrics or Program Unit’s self-review, decides to follow-up with an external review, a reviewer will be selected by the Program Committee. Efforts are made to locate a member who has expertise in the field and who is able to play the role of participant-observer in the unit’s review.

The reviewer’s written report, is based on

  1. attending as many sessions of the unit as possible during the Annual Meeting, including the unit’s business meeting(s);
  2. personal interviews with the unit chairs, members of the steering committee and a cross-section of participants at Annual Meetings both current and previous (if that can be arranged); and
  3. the unit’s written self-review.

D. Special consideration of creative sessions, strategies, experiments

E. Quantitative data collected in connection with the Annual Meeting

Some of this data is derived from the PAPERS System, but also from the Annual Reports (see graphs here for data on Proposals, Sessions, Attendance, Acceptances, Selectivity, Proposal Ratio, Cosponsorships, and Collaborativity).